Omen Laptop - 17t Gaming 6gb Gfx Review
HP Omen 17 Laptop Review: High-end gaming with some small-scale limitations
A cost factor. Despite its high cost, the electric current high-end configuration of the HP Omen 17 is all the same significantly cheaper than other RTX 2080 laptops. Find out whether the HP Omen 17 can proceed up with its competition in aspects other than performance in our detailed review.
HP'southward Omen series has been producing potent gaming devices with both an attractive exterior and an bonny price for several years now. The 2019 generation is no exception. Let usa have a look at the Omen 17, for case, which has a starting price of around $1400. For this toll, buyers will receive aCore i7-9750H from Intel and a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti from Nvidia as well as 16 GB of RAM and one.25 TB of storage capacity (SSD + HDD). On top of all that, the device features a matte 144-Hz IPS panel. Today's examination unit is a more elaborate model and is equipped with aCore i9-9880H (8 instead of half dozen cores), a GeForce RTX 2080 , 32 GB of DDR4 RAM and a total of 3 TB of storage (SSD-RAID + HDD). Its price point: $2500.
As mentioned above, the Omen 17 still is quite affordable compared to its competitors. You will currently need to coughing up an boosted $k for a similarly-equippedMSI GE75 9SG. Other RTX 2080 laptops, such as theMSI GT76 9SG , the Schenker XMG Ultra 17 and the Alienware Surface area-51m (each with desktop CPU), can cost as much as $4000+ for a similar configuration.
Memory
32768 MB
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMM, Dual-Channel, all slots occupied
Display
17.30 inch 16:ix, 1920 10 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN175D, IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, 1000-Sync, glossy: no
Storage
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), 1024 GB
, + TOSHIBA MQ04ABD200, ii TB HDD @5400 rpm. Slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x two,5 inch
Weight
3.3 kg ( = 116.4 oz / seven.28 pounds), Power Supply: 1.146 kg ( = xl.42 oz / ii.53 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or retention sticks with similar specifications.
While the quality of the example is not particularly impressive (merely the meridian of the base unit is made of metal), nosotros were still very pleased with it in general. This is mainly due to its unique blueprint, which sets itself apart from other gaming notebooks thanks to its unusual form and contours.
Dissimilar with the terminal generation, HP has now decided confronting using red elements as highlights, which we think was a good selection. This makes the case appear a corking deal more grown-up. Although the bottom bezel continues to be rather broad, nosotros appreciate the general modify to a slim-bezel design. Specially the side and tiptop bezels were significantly wider on the predecessor.
Some other advantage of the new generation is its lower weight. The Omen 17 now weighs 3.3 kg (~7.3 lb) instead of 3.7 kg (~8.2 lb). This is still heavier than the MSI GE75 9SG (2.vii kg/~half-dozen lb), merely lighter than theMSI GT76 9SG, Schenker XMG Ultra 17 and Alienware Area 51m (3.9/~8.6 to 4.3 kg/~ix.five lb). The Omen 17 can shell all of its competitors in terms of thickness: 2.vii cm (~1.ane in) is the lowest you lot tin become in this comparison field.
Apart from its size, weight and look, nosotros would depict this case every bit average. The workmanship is fine apart from some small-scale details and the hinges are non particularly noteworthy either. HP could, however, improve the stability of the display cover, equally this can exist warped and squeezed together quite easilyin some areas. Merely then once more, the same can be said for a lot of other notebooks as well. The base unit does not give way even under stiff pressure.
❌
Ports
The Omen 17 has a decent port selection that includes iii classic USB iii.0 Type A ports too as a modern Type C port that supports USB 3.ane Gen 2, DisplayPort and Thunderbolt 3. The other ports include an HDMI connector and a Mini-DisplayPort for connecting external monitors, an SD carte du jour reader and an RJ45 port likewise as 2 audio jacks. The Omen 17 does not have a Kensington Lock connector.
Equally most of the ports are positioned towards the back of the sides, there is sufficient space for using a physical mouse on either side of the device.
The performance of the card reader is average - neither peculiarly bad, nor particularly good. Nosotros measured a rate of fourscore MB/s for sequential reading and transferring photos. This positions the Omen 17 between theMSI GE75 9SG (~30 MB/south) and the Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (~200 MB/s). TheMSI GT76 9SG only has space for a microSD menu while theAlienware Area 51m has completely foregone an SD card reader.
HP has made no compromises in terms of Wi-Fi performance and has equipped our examination unit of measurement with anIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX200, a very fast and up-to-appointment WLAN module. The transfer rates of 749 Mbit/southward and reception rates of 675 Mbit/due south comfortably position our Omen 17 in first and 2d place, respectively.
We would like to mention the Command Center, a kind of cardinal hub that pulls together various features, monitoring options and settings. Apart from getting an idea of the load level and temperature of the CPU, GPU and storage, you can also employ it to command network traffic (including an optional booster), customize the macro keys, adjust the keyboard backlighting and change the power control. As yous tin can see from the sixth screenshot, the bachelor power modes are comfort, standard and performance. Nosotros ran our tests on standard settings, which is the way that is activated ex-works.
The AC adapter that comes with the RTX 2080 version of the Omen 17 has a rated output of 330 watts and has a rather unusual shape. It is effectually xv x 15 x four cm (~five.9 x v.9 x 1.half dozen in) large. All other 330-watt Ac adapters that we have seen upward until now were narrower, just usually significantly longer and thicker. The simply other thing in the Omen 17'south box is a small quick-get-go guide.
Nosotros are non quite sure what to think of maintenance on this 17-inch gamer. The good news is that you lot tin access all components by removing the bottom embrace (see photos). The bad news is that the bottom cover is rather difficult to remove in the kickoff place. Users will need a fine spatula, which might discourage some less experienced laptop owners. Removing the ten Philipps screws was no consequence.
Like most gaming laptops, the HP Omen 17 comes with a two-year warranty.
Keyboard
The input devices do a good chore, although we are not completely satisfied with them. HP has decided to go with a chiclet keyboard with four-zone backlighting (which is rather weak, unfortunately). The WASD area is considered an individual zone. These keys are already set-off from the area effectually them by having a white border.
We are quite happy with the size of the keyboard and keys. All the same, the small arrow keys were a petty tiresome during testing. To make up for this, users volition be pleased to hear that the Omen 17 features a full-sized number pad. The macro keys to the left of the keyboard are an additional feature which some users will appreciate more than others. Special keys practice tend to lead to wrong entries at first, because the main keyboard is moved slightly to the right in order to adjust them. Typing is comfortable enough. The well-defined finish is accompanied by a relatively loud clatter, which is why the Omen 17 is not really suitable for quiet environs.
The touchpad has a good size at 10.two x v.6 cm (~iv 10 2.2 in). Due to its slightly rough stop, fingers do not glide over the surface as easily equally on some other gaming notebooks. The dedicated mouse keys have a clear (and loud) pressure betoken and feedback. Not surprisingly, the touchpad supports several gestures. Nosotros had no problems zooming and scrolling with 2 fingers. The precision of the touchpad is boilerplate.
HP has joined in the current trend of using high-refresh-rate displays and has equipped the Omen 17 with a 144-Hz IPS display with a matte surface. The panel (CMN175D) is quite impressive. Information technology has a contrast ratio of 1385:one and a black value of 0.26 cd/yard². This places our 17-inch gamer correct at the forepart of our comparison field.
| 343 cd/m² | 355 cd/m² | 328 cd/m² | ||
| 342 cd/m² | 360 cd/m² | 343 cd/chiliad² | ||
| 337 cd/m² | 336 cd/chiliad² | 335 cd/thou² | ||
Distribution of effulgence
CMN175D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 342.1 cd/1000² Minimum: 23 cd/1000²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 1385:1 (Blackness: 0.26 cd/thousand²)
ΔE Color one.91 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.four, calibrated: 0.78
ΔE Greyscale 2.72 | 0.64-98 Ø5.half dozen
96% sRGB (Argyll one.6.3 3D)
sixty% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll i.half-dozen.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
96% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% Display P3 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080 | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080 | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -2% | 30% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.seven | 61.5 -3% | 62.3 -ii% | 86.3 35% | 66.3 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96 | 92 -4% | 93.4 -3% | 100 4% | 96.9 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 63.5 -3% | 64.3 -2% | 99.1 51% | 66.5 1% |
| Response Times | 34% | 23% | -115% | fifteen% | |
| Response Time Grayness 50% / Gray 80% * | 17.half dozen ? | seven.2 ? 59% | viii ? 55% | 41.6 ? -136% | 13.2 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | eleven.2 ? | 6.vi ? 41% | 10 ? xi% | 21.half dozen ? -93% | 10.8 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 26040 ? ii% | 26040 ? two% | ||
| Screen | -2% | -iii% | -37% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 360 | 400.7 11% | 396 10% | 343 -5% | 335.2 -7% |
| Brightness | 342 | 372 ix% | 373 9% | 328 -4% | 297 -thirteen% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 89 -two% | 82 -ten% | 82 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.34 -31% | 0.33 -27% | 0.31 -19% | 0.66 -154% |
| Contrast | 1385 | 1179 -xv% | 1200 -thirteen% | 1106 -20% | 508 -63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | one.91 | i.33 30% | ii.04 -7% | five.03 -163% | 2.02 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.08 | 3.51 14% | 3.85 6% | 7.91 -94% | 7.23 -77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.78 | 1.39 -78% | 0.82 -v% | 0.86 -10% | 1.17 -fifty% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | two.72 | 1.3 52% | 2.83 -four% | 6.29 -131% | iii.2 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | ii.24 98% | 2.49 88% | ii.38 92% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6692 97% | 6735 97% | 7113 91% | 6389 102% | 6746 96% |
| Colour Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 58.two -3% | 59 -2% | 88 47% | 61.3 2% |
| Color Infinite (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 92.1 -iv% | 94 -2% | 100 4% | 96.nine i% |
| Total Average (Programme / Settings) | 10% / 4% | half-dozen% / 1% | -41% / -34% | -6% / -23% |
* ... smaller is better
The average brightness of 342 cd/m² is great also and enables users to utilise this device outdoors. We are also impressed by the color accuracy. The brandish manages to stay within the ideal range (DeltaE below three) both in the grayscale and the color examination. The packet is completed with a decent color space, which covers 96 percent of sRGB and 60 percent of the AdobeRGB color space.
The display besides has rather low response times (for an IPS panel). Most gamers should exist quite happy with 11.2 ms blackness-to-white and 17.6 ms gray-to-grey. There is room for comeback in terms of brightness distribution, however. Nosotros noticed backlight bleeding both forth the top and bottom edge.
PWM is used up to a brightness level of 44 pct. However, this flickering should not be an upshot even for sensitive users due to the high frequency of 25 kHz. All in all, the paradigm quality of this panel meets our expectations for this price range.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can atomic number 82 to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Blackness to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| xi.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ half-dozen ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows practiced response rates in our tests, but may be besides deadening for competitive gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.v ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Fourth dimension 50% Grey to 80% Grayness | ||
| 17.6 ms ... rising ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.four ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.two ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be as well boring for competitive gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » nineteen % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is ameliorate than the average of all tested devices (37.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will merely cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human center. If said frequency is as well depression, users with sensitive eyes may feel strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25510 Hz | ≤ 44 % brightness setting |  |
| The brandish backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 44 % and below. At that place should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not discover any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices practise non employ PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: five - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The all-time configuration of the Omen 17, which we are testing today, features a Core i9-9880H, a GeForce RTX 2080 and 32 GB of DDR4 RAM (2x 16 GB, dual aqueduct). This hardware combination makes this device suitable for nigh any expanse of use and should time to come-proof it for quite some time. The SSD RAID likewise guarantees a fast organization performance with curt load and boot times.
The Core i9-9880H is currently the 2d fastest mobile processor on the market. The viii-core chip from Intel'southward optimized Java Lake generation has a generous 16-MP L3 cache and, similar its slower half-dozen-core siblings (the Core i7-9750H, for instance), is rated at 45 watts. Thanks to hyperthreading technology, the octa-core processor can piece of work up to 16 threads simultaneously.
The clock rates are quite impressive, too. As long as the cooling organization allows information technology, the Core i9-9880H can reach clock rates up to 4.8 GHz, which is quite a lot for a laptop. Unfortunately, the Omen 17 cannot make the most out of the CPU'south potential. While it does adequately well in unmarried-core and 3D applications with low core utilization, reaching clock rates over 4 GHz, the CPU can just achieve between 2.ix and 4.0 GHz in applications that use all cores. The clock rate even drops to ii.9 GHz permanently after a while.
This beliefs is depicted very nicely in our Cinebench graph, which shows a drib in operation of around 10 percent from the 2d circular onwards. While other 9880H laptops, such equally the MSI GE75 9SG, also lose several percentage in this scenario, their clock rate is higher from the start. The Omen 17 cannot compete with notebooks that are equipped with the Cadre i9-9900K. Both the MSI GT76 9SG and the Schenker XMG Ultra 17, also as the Alienware Area 51m easily beat the Omen 17 in our Cinebench loop and multi-core test.
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
197 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1450 Points
Help
Nosotros cannot criticize the overall system performance of our test unit. The HP notebook does not make the podium in PCMark 10, but its score of 6558 points is very skillful nonetheless, and promises a fast and smoothen-running system.
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG | |
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (4077 - 8007, north=184, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
A big office of the Omen 17's strong overall performance is due to the SSD. In social club to become the nigh out of the 17-inch device, HP has combined two Thousand.2 drives from Samsung (PM981) to a RAID 0 set up with a capacity of ane TB. The CrystalDiskMark shows no weaknesses. The results are corking when dealing with both pocket-size and large files. Still, some devices manage to reach comparable speeds with merely one SSD (encounter the Samsung 970 Evo Plus in the Schenker XMG Ultra 17).
Most users should be well-equipped in terms of storage capacity for quite a while. The combination of the SSD RAID with an additional ii.5-inch HDD difficult bulldoze ways that this configuration of the Omen 17 has a total storage chapters of iii TB. The ToshibaMQ04ABD200 HDD, offers a adequately decent performance for a 5400-RPM drive.
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | -11% | 11% | v% | |
| Write 4K | 103.8 | 116.i 12% | 101.4 -2% | 183.2 76% | 111.1 vii% |
| Read 4K | 41.67 | 44.98 8% | xl.57 -3% | 52.4 26% | 45.47 nine% |
| Write Seq | 2639 | 2370 -10% | 2229 -sixteen% | 1790 -32% | 2454 -7% |
| Read Seq | 2702 | 1465 -46% | 2528 -6% | 1743 -35% | 2212 -18% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 487.three | 337.five -31% | 379.6 -22% | 550 13% | 622 28% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 555 | 453.6 -18% | 421.9 -24% | 648 17% | 695 25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2967 | 2399 -19% | 2439 -xviii% | 3236 9% | 2675 -10% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3102 | 3087 0% | 3199 3% | 3538 xiv% | 3184 3% |
CDM 5/six Read Seq Q32T1: 3102 MB/s
CDM 5/half dozen Write Seq Q32T1: 2967 MB/s
CDM five/half-dozen Read 4K Q32T1: 555 MB/south
CDM v/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 487.3 MB/s
CDM v Read Seq: 2702 MB/southward
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2639 MB/s
CDM 5/half-dozen Read 4K: 41.67 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 103.8 MB/s
Sequential Read: 2568MB/due south
Sequential Write: 2608MB/s
Admission Fourth dimension Read: 0.057ms
Admission Time Write: 0.038ms
The GeForce RTX 2080 currently is Nvidia'due south strongest notebook GPU. The Turing-based DirectX 12 monster has 2944 shaders and an 8-GB GDDR6 VRAM (256-bit interface). Its base clock charge per unit is 1380 MHz, although the GPU boost (works like to Intel's turbo boost) enables far college clock rates.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 25017 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 44234 points | |
| 3DMark Burn Strike Score | 19351 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9177 points | |
| Assistance | ||
As with the CPU, the clock rate of the GPU is not used to its full potential. Both in 3DMark 11 and in 3DMark 12, the performance of the RTX 2080 is effectually 10 percent beneath the boilerplate of previously tested competitors. The same goes for games, during which the clock charge per unit settles at effectually 1600 MHz. This is non a particularly bad result, only it does not place our exam unit in the top range, either. We would like to mention that almost every competitor pays for the higher functioning with a thicker instance. The Omen 17, on the other hand, is ane of the slimmest RTX 2080 laptops available. This puts the divergence in operation into perspective.
We did not notice whatsoever anomalies in our gaming test with " The Witcher 3" (one 920x1080, maximum details). The frame rate remained constant and there were no drops in performance. Past the mode, HP has foregone the graphics switching featureOptimus in exchange for using G-Sync to better the image.
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø94 (88-99)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø89.4 (84-96)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0): Ø95.nine (xc-101)
The gaming capabilities of the Omen 17 were tested with 13 games dating from 2015 to 2019. In short: Users tin play demanding titles such as " Anno 1800" and " Metro Exodus" at native resolution and maximum settings.
The GeForce RTX 2080 displays less CPU-intensive games such as " F1 2019" , " Rage 2" and " Apex Legends" at over 100 FPS. Therefore, nosotros can confirm that the 144-Hz panel is here for a reason. The Omen 17 would also do well with an (external) WQHD or 4K display.
The combination of high-end hardware, a relatively slim case and the missing graphics switching software leads to very loud arrangement noise. The 17-inch gamer is clearly audible at 34 to 36 dB(A), even while idling. Light to medium loads, such as Windows Updates, soon crusade the cooling fan to speed up, which could bother many users.
The device becomes especially loud when running 3D applications. Although the Omen 17 is quieter than another RTX 2080 laptops (despite its slim build), sensitive users volition still accept difficulties with a noise level of 47 to 51 dB(A) under load, which is why we would recommend using headphones in these situations.
Noise Level
| Idle | 34 / 35 / 36 dB(A) | |
| HDD | 33 dB(A) | |
| Load | 51 / 51 dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) l dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | five% | -5% | 1% | -i% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | xxx | 28.two 6% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.ane half dozen% | 25.vi ? xv% |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 30.4 11% | 33 three% | 30 12% | 28.ane 17% | 27.3 ? xx% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | thirty.4 thirteen% | 34 3% | 33 half-dozen% | 28.6 18% | 29.1 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 33.4 7% | 44 -22% | 35 iii% | 51 -42% | 33.4 ? 7% |
| Load Average * | 51 | 37.i 27% | 47 viii% | 44 xiv% | 51 -0% | 45.2 ? 11% |
| Witcher three ultra * | 47 | 54.two -15% | 53 -13% | 55 -17% | 51 -ix% | |
| Load Maximum * | 51 | 56.iv -11% | 59 -16% | 58 -14% | 51 -0% | 52.9 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is improve
The temperature development of the Omen 17 is similar to that of its competition. The case reaches a maximum of 47 °C (~117 °F)on the top and 54 °C (~129 °F)on the bottom of the base unit of measurement, which is typical for a notebook of this performance range. The surface remains relatively cool at around 30 °C (~86 °F)while idling.
Now let us take a look at the insides. While the components go relatively warm nether load, they do not heat upwardly too much. Both during "Witcher iii" and nether maximum load using FurMark and Prime95, the CPU and GPU only heat upwards to around 80 °C (~176 °F). While the GeForce RTX 2080 did non throttle during the stress examination, the clock rate of the Core i9-9880H dropped to around 2.0 to ii.1 GHz at maximum load.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 47 °C = 117 F Boilerplate: 42.8 °C = 109 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 54 °C = 129 F Average: 40 °C = 104 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 45 °C = 113 F | Room Temperature 23 °C = 73 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 32 °C = 90 F Average: 29.two °C = 85 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: thirty °C = 86 F Average: 27.9 °C = 82 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 32 °C = 90 F | Room Temperature 23 °C = 73 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 46 °C = 115 F Average: 42.6 °C = 109 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 55 °C = 131 F Average: 40.3 °C = 105 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ability Supply (max.) 45 °C = 113 F | Room Temperature 23 °C = 73 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.eight °C / 109 F, compared to the boilerplate of 33.vii °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of xl.iii °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.viii °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats upwards to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.1 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device boilerplate of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad tin get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.four F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-9 °C / -16.2 F).
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of grade Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -fifteen% | iii% | -1% | -half-dozen% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 48.eight -iv% | 51 -ix% | 45 four% | 47 -0% | 47.9 ? -two% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 52 4% | 57 -6% | 45 17% | 58.8 -9% | 52.two ? three% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 36.2 -xiii% | 26 nineteen% | 36 -13% | 31 3% | 31.6 ? 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 44.4 -48% | 28 7% | 33 -10% | 35 -17% | 33.3 ? -eleven% |
* ... smaller is better
The Omen 17 gets some extra points for its surprisingly good sound quality. The two speakers that are positioned on the sides of the device come from Bang & Olufsen (or rather, they are certified by the visitor) and offer a fairly balanced audio experience that includes highs, mids and lows - despite not having a subwoofer. Many gaming competitors accept to make do with significantly lower audio quality.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average xiii.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% abroad from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.ii% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is boilerplate (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - xvi.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% deviation to median)
Compared to same course
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were amend, 6% like, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of six%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were amend, ii% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, boilerplate was 20%, worst was 65%
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.seven% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% college than median
(±) | linearity of mids is boilerplate (eleven.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (vii.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - sixteen.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (xiv.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, vi% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of six%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
The lack of Nvidia'due south Optimus technology has an touch on the ability consumption and bombardment life of the device. The Omen 17 consumes between 26 and 38 watts while idling. This is significantly higher than the ability consumption of the MSI notebooks GE75 9SG and GT76 9SG, for instance, which is betwixt 14 and 23 watts in this scenario. The HP device is a little more than economical than its RTX 2080 competition when working under load. It consumes betwixt 106 and 287 watts nether 3D load. The included Air conditioning adapter has a rated output of 330 watts, so that still leaves a decent corporeality of headroom.
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability Consumption | 19% | six% | -33% | -22% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | thirteen.nine 47% | 14 46% | 39 -l% | 23.three x% | 13.7 ? 47% |
| Idle Boilerplate * | 29 | xviii.8 35% | eighteen 38% | 45 -55% | 33.v -16% | 18.1 ? 38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 23.1 39% | 23 39% | 55 -45% | 38.iv -1% | 26.3 ? 31% |
| Load Average * | 106 | 112.three -half dozen% | 114 -8% | 122 -15% | 114.one -8% | 108.5 ? -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 228 | 231 -ane% | 283 -24% | 259 -14% | 339.5 -49% | |
| Load Maximum * | 287 | 291.5 -2% | 443 -54% | 346 -21% | 485.one -69% | 217 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
If a long battery life is important to y'all, you lot might want to look elsewhere. In 2019, the Omen 17's ane to four hours max is meagre, even for a gaming notebook. HP has given the Omen 17 an 8-cell bombardment with a capacity of 70 Wh. This cannot compare with the batteries of the MSI GT75 9SG, Schenker XMG Ultra 17 or Alienware Expanse 51m, which have bombardment capacities ranging from 82 to 90 Wh. Only the MSI GE75 9SG has a smaller battery (65 Wh), but compensates for this by using Nvidia'south graphics switching engineering.
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 4h 10min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 3h 16min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 03min |
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, seventy Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, ninety Wh | Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 50% | 34% | -21% | -23% | 88% | |
| Reader / Idle | 250 | 409 64% | 165 -34% | 155 -38% | 601 ? 140% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 196 | 294 50% | 302 54% | 135 -31% | 127 -35% | 354 ? 81% |
| Load | 63 | 52 -17% | 65 3% | 66 five% | ninety.2 ? 43% | |
| H.264 | 135 | 395 ? |
Pros
+ ample storage infinite
+ very skilful 144-Hz panel
+ decent sound
+ a lot of ports
+ elegant design
+ 1000-Sync
Cons
- CPU could make better use of its turbo
- relatively short battery life
- uncomfortable maintenance
- loud system noise
At the finish of the mean solar day, the HP Omen 17-cb0020ng manages to score peak marks.
Let us start with the positives. Apart from the relatively good price-to-performance ratio compared to the RTX 2080 competition (granted, the 17-inch laptop is quite expensive nonetheless) we were also impressed by the design of the case. The sound and port selection (Thunderbolt 3),as well as the dandy 144-Hz brandish with support for G-Sync, all play their part in making this a good notebook.
We were less impressed by the level of system noise during 3D applications, the subpar maintenance options and the modest CPU clock rate under multi-core load. The limited bombardment life rounds off the listing of rather disappointing aspects.
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng - 2020-05-fourteen 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing upward with MS-DOS and Windows three.ane in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly existence on high-performance gaming laptops.
I completed my principal'due south degree in translation at the Academy of Vienna a few years ago and have been working as a translator for English, German and French always since. I get-go started translating for Notebookcheck in 2017 and have learned more most computers than I e'er imagined, and I have even become the person my family turns to for advice when it comes to consumer electronics. Other than that I too focus on everything connected to sustainability and renewable energy.
Florian Glaser, 2019-08-27 (Update: 2019-08-28)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Omen-17-Laptop-Review-High-end-gaming-with-some-small-limitations.432964.0.html
0 Response to "Omen Laptop - 17t Gaming 6gb Gfx Review"
ارسال یک نظر